00:10:48
Roblox, one of the world's most popular gaming platforms with 78 million daily users, faces unprecedented legal challenges and public backlash over allegations of systemic child safety failures. Multiple lawsuits claim the company prioritized growth over protection while marketing itself as a "safe digital playground."
A landmark lawsuit centers on a minor identified as "DH" who joined Roblox believing its safety promises. According to court documents, an adult predator contacted her through the platform, bypassed moderation systems, and later abducted and abused her. Police reports indicate this wasn't isolated:
YouTuber Schle (1M+ subscribers), who suffered childhood trauma from a Roblox developer, began working with police to expose predators. His investigations led to six arrests. Instead of support, Roblox banned his accounts and issued a cease-and-desist letter accusing him of "vigilantism."
"They're trying to silence whistleblowers. They spend more energy going after people like Schle than predators," stated a child safety advocate.
After Schle shared his experience in an 8-minute video, massive backlash ensued:
Community Response
Institutional Impact
Lawsuits identify three critical safety failures in Roblox's architecture:
Issue | Risk | Current Mitigation |
---|---|---|
1. Account Creation Until 2021, only username/password/DOB required |
Children could unlock unrestricted chat by mistyping age | ID verification for 13+; age estimation via AI |
2. Robux Currency In-game currency for avatar customization |
Predators exploit "do anything for Robux" mentality to groom children | No systemic solution implemented |
3. Moderation Gaps 3,000 moderators for 50K+ chats/second |
Filters miss emoji/wordplay loopholes (e.g., "Discord" → "D!sc0rd") | "Trusted connections" feature; AI scanning |
Roblox employs roughly 3,000 moderators despite processing more than 50,000 chats per second. By comparison, TikTok has 13 times more moderators for triple the users. Internal documents reveal:
While platforms typically avoid liability under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, lawyers argue Roblox's case differs fundamentally:
Core Legal Argument: Lawsuits focus on Roblox’s design choices and corporate misrepresentation—not user-generated content. Courts have ruled Section 230 doesn't shield companies that market platforms as "safe" while ignoring known risks.
Schle's attorney now represents over 800 sex abuse survivors in cases against Roblox. A plaintiff victory could force industry-wide changes:
Legal experts note this case reflects growing pressure on tech companies to prioritize safety—especially for younger users—over unchecked growth. Jury trials will determine if Roblox’s systems constituted negligence.